Quesarby MLAI

Services

Choose the next engineering decision.

Start with assessment, build a bounded workflow, or harden a release path. The service catalog proposes concrete deliverables for retrieval, orchestration, deployment, and evaluation engagements.

Engagement scope, deliverables, and acceptance criteria are agreed for each project.

Inspect the source behind this page

Work with MLAI

Turn your next system into something inspectable.

Start with a defined engineering scope. Agree deliverables, access, and acceptance criteria before work begins.

Pilot engagement

$2,500 USD / one month

A scoped engineering engagement for an AI workflow, retrieval path, or private deployment. Scope and delivery dates are agreed with you.

  • Agreed deliverables and acceptance criteria
  • One month, with no automatic renewal
  • Invoiced engagement; hosted model access is not included
Discuss the Pilot →

Static preview

Online invoice requests requires the server deployment, which is not live here.

Contact us to agree the scope and arrange an invoice. Online payment collection is not available on this site.

Platform engagement

Built around your scope.

For larger integration, hardening, and deployment work, define the architecture and delivery milestones together. Pricing follows the agreed scope.

  • Architecture and integration planning
  • Operational and security acceptance criteria
  • Custom pricing and invoicing
Discuss a Platform engagement →

Core

Nine proposed engagement scopes.

Autonomy Readiness Audit

Proposed scope: map workflows, prompt surfaces, data paths, and approval gates to identify automation candidates and the evidence needed to evaluate their risks.

  • Risk register
  • Control-map
  • 90-day rollout plan
Discuss this service

WDBX Retrieval Architecture

Proposed scope: design retrieval pipelines with source context and inspectable vector search; evaluate weighted backtrace approaches separately.

  • Index strategy
  • Recall benchmarks
  • Trace schema
Discuss this service

Multi-Agent Orchestration

Proposed scope: define and implement agent roles, tool permissions, task handoffs, and conflict-resolution policies against agreed acceptance criteria.

  • Agent graph
  • Tool policy
  • Evaluation harness
Discuss this service

Model & Runtime Optimization

Proposed scope: profile inference paths, memory pressure, batching, and edge constraints on an agreed workload and environment.

  • Latency profile
  • Optimization backlog
  • Capacity model
Discuss this service

Safety & Compliance Layering

Proposed scope: develop policy checks, audit trails, and red-team scenarios for an agreed system boundary. Legal or compliance acceptance requires separate review.

  • Policy matrix
  • Audit events
  • Red-team scripts
Discuss this service

Private AI Deployment

Proposed scope: assess and package workflows for an agreed VPC, on-premise, offline, or hybrid deployment boundary.

  • Deployment topology
  • Runbook
  • Rollback plan
Discuss this service

Research Translation

Proposed scope: translate papers and notebooks into a constrained prototype, API contract, and test plan.

  • Prototype hardening
  • API contract
  • Test plan
Discuss this service

Executive & Engineering Workshops

Proposed scope: run workshops with leadership, security, product, and engineering to document autonomy decisions and risk boundaries.

  • Decision memo
  • Team training
  • Architecture review
Discuss this service

Continuous Evaluation Systems

Proposed scope: build evaluation suites for tool use, retrieval faithfulness, policy behavior, and regression drift against agreed criteria.

  • Eval suite
  • Scorecards
  • Release gates
Discuss this service

Proposed engagement process

Define the release evidence together.

These four proposed phases identify deliverables to agree for each project: a register, a harness, a baseline, and acceptance criteria.

  1. 01

    Audit

    Proposed deliverable: an inventory of workflows, data, tools, and failure modes, with a risk register for review before design.

  2. 02

    Design

    Proposed deliverables: a bounded architecture for retrieval, permissions, personas, and deployment, plus an agreed evaluation harness.

  3. 03

    Build

    Proposed deliverables: an implementation on agreed operator-owned hardware and a baseline the team can rerun against the harness.

  4. 04

    Harden

    Proposed deliverables: red-team checks, rollback guidance, observability, operator training, and a release gate with explicit acceptance criteria.

Fit

What we say no to.

Discuss your projectRead the architecture
Discuss your project

Next

Developers

What you can run without an engagement.

Next

Company

Who develops this, and the site's integrity rules.